I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2013/C 377/39
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Microsoft Corp. (Redmond, United States) (represented by: A. Meijboom, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Softkinetic Software SA (Brussels, Belgium)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 25 July 2013 given in Case R 2373/2011-1;
—Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings; and
—Order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, should it intervene, to pay the costs incurred in the proceedings before the OHIM.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘KINECT’ for goods in Class 9 — Community trade mark application No 9 058 141
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Mark or sign cited in opposition: The word mark ‘SOFTKINETIC’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 28, 38, 41 and 42 — International registration No 1 025 034 designating the European Union; the word mark ‘SOFTKINETIC’ for goods and services in classes 9, 28, 38, 41 and 42 — Benelux trade mark registration No 850 946
Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Upheld the appeal and annulled the contested decision
Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(5) and 8(1)(b) CTMR.