- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-409/24: Action brought on 6 August 2024 – Al-Aqeelah Takaful Insurance Company v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0409
62024TN0409
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/5507
23.9.2024
(Case T-409/24)
(C/2024/5507)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Al-Aqeelah Takaful Insurance Company (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: J. Fermon, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should annul:
—Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP (1) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria;
—Council Regulation (EU) n° 36/2012 (2) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria;
—Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1510 (3) of 27 May 2024 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria;
—Council implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1517 (4) of 27 May 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) n° 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria, in so far as those four acts include or maintain the Applicant’s name on the lists annexed to those acts;
—Order the Council to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging violation of the duty to state reasons enshrined in Article 296 TFEU, Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the principle of good administration enshrined in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights
2.Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment, violation of Articles 15.1(a) of Council Regulation (EU) 36/2012 and Article 28 of Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP, Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the principle of proportionality.
3.Third plea in law, alleging violation of Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the principles of good administration, including the duty of care, diligence and precision.
* Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ L 147, 1.6.2013, p. 14.
(2) OJ L 16, 19.1.2012, p. 1.
(3) OJ L, 2024/1510.
(4) OJ L, 2024/1517.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5507/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *