- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-862/24, Satiksmes ministrija: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 13 December 2024 – Satiksmes ministrija v A
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0862
62024CN0862
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/1220
(Case C-862/24, Satiksmes ministrija)
(C/2025/1220)
Language of the case: Latvian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant on a point of law and defendant at first instance: Satiksmes ministrija
Applicant at first instance and respondent on a point of law: A
Questions referred
1.If an examinee is shown to have engaged in fraudulent conduct by showing the examiner, during the practical skill test, false documents concerning the acquisition of practical training, is the competent national aviation authority empowered, for the purposes of point ARA.GEN.355(e) [of Annex VI] to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 of 3 November 2011 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council, (1) to ban the person concerned temporarily from retaking the skill test to obtain a private pilot licence and from obtaining a private pilot licence?
2.Should the explanation on point ARA.GEN.355(e) [of Annex VI] to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 of 3 November 2011 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as laid down in the document published by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency under the title ‘Acceptable means of compliance. Part FCL’, namely that the type of enforcement measure depends on the applicable national law and may include, for example, a prohibition from exercising, be interpreted as meaning that it empowers the competent authority to choose appropriate limitations (derived from point ARA.FCL.300(f)) which achieve the objectives of that regulation, if the national law does not provide for a specific temporary ban on the performance of the skill test to obtain a private pilot licence?
3.Is it consistent with the principle of legal certainty and with Article 52(1) of the Charter to interpret point ARA.FCL.300(f) [of Annex VI] to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 of 3 November 2011 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in such a way that the temporary ban on performing the theoretical knowledge test provided for in that point may be extended to the retaking of the skill test?
Language of the case: Latvian.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1220/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—