- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-485/14: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2016 — Bon Net v OHIM — Aldi (Bon Appétit!) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Bon Appétit! — Prior national figurative marks Бoн Апемú and Bon Apetí — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TA0485
62014TA0485
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 98/39
(Case T-485/14)(1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark Bon Appétit! - Prior national figurative marks Бoн Апемú and Bon Apetí - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2016/C 098/50)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Bon Net OOD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: A. Ivanova, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Hanne and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court: Aldi GmbH & Co. KG (Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany) (represented by: L, Kolks, C. Fürsen, N. Lützenrath and U. Rademacher, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 April 2014 (Case R 1199/2013-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Bon Net OOD and Aldi GmbH & Co. KG.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Bon Net OOD to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and by Aldi GmbH & Co. KG.
(1) OJ C 261, 11.8.2014.
* Language of the case: German.