- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-297/08: Action brought on 29 July 2008 — Mepos Electronics v OHIM (MEPOS)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0297
62008TN0297
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.9.2008
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 247/20
(Case T-297/08)
(2008/C 247/39)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Mepos Electronics Ltd (Kaohsiung, Taiwan) (represented by M. Wirtz, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
—Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 May 2008 in case R 437/2008-2;
—Grant the request for restitutio in integrum; and
—Order OHIM to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘MEPOS’ for goods in class 9 — application No 5 770 383
Decision of the examiner: Refusal of the applicant's trade mark
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 36, 77(a) and 79 of Council Regulation No 40/94, as well as Article 6 of European Convention on Human Rights and Article 6(2) of Treaty on European Union as the Board of Appeal erred in concluding that the examiner has followed a lawful proceeding in the application process; infringement of Article 78 of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the Board of Appeal erred by not granting the request for restitutio in integrum for failure to comply with the time-limit to file an appeal.