EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-61/22: Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2023 — OD v Eurojust (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Temporary reassignment in the interests of the service — Article 7 of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Provisional distancing measure — Concept of ‘act adversely affecting an official’ — Right to be heard — Liability)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0061

62022TA0061

April 19, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

30.5.2023

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/29

(Case T-61/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Temporary reassignment in the interests of the service - Article 7 of the Staff Regulations - Request for assistance - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Provisional distancing measure - Concept of ‘act adversely affecting an official’ - Right to be heard - Liability)

(2023/C 189/38)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: OD (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (represented by: A. Terstegen-Verhaag and M. Castro Granja, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of 17 June 2021 by which the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) decided to reassign her temporarily to a [confidential] post, as well as, in so far as necessary, the decision of 21 October 2021 by which Eurojust rejected her complaint of 22 June 2021, and, secondly, compensation for the damage which she claims to have suffered following those decisions.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls the decision of the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) of 17 June 2021 concerning the temporary reassignment of OD to a [confidential] post;

2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

3.Orders Eurojust to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by OD.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 119, 14.3.2022.

Language of the case: French

ECLI:EU:C:2023:140

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia