- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-38/16: Order of the General Court of 5 July 2017 — EEB v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents concerning the withdrawal of Proposal COM(2014) 397 final for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council — Partial refusal of access — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TB0038
62016TB0038
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.8.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 283/49
(Case T-38/16)(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents concerning the withdrawal of Proposal COM(2014) 397 final for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council - Partial refusal of access - No need to adjudicate)
(2017/C 283/76)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: European Environmental Bureau (EEB) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. Kloostra, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Buchet, F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and E. Sanfrutos Cano, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision Ares(2015) 5212500 of 19 November 2015.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.
2.The European Commission is to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Environmental Bureau (EEB).
Language of the case: English
(1) OJ C 118, 4.4.2016.
* * *