- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-61/24, Lindenbaumer: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany), lodged on 29 January 2024 - DL v PQ
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0061
62024CN0061
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/2925
(Case C-61/24, Lindenbaumer)
(C/2024/2925)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Defendant and appellant in the appeal on a point of law: DL
Applicant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: PQ
Question referred
Which criteria should be used to determine where the spouses are habitually resident within the meaning of Article 8(a) and (b) of the Rome III Regulation? In particular:
does a posting as a diplomat affect or even preclude the assumption of habitual residence in the receiving State?
must the physical presence of the spouses in a State be of a certain duration before it can be assumed that habitual residence had been established there?
does the establishment of habitual residence require a certain degree of social and family integration in the State in question?
The present case is designated by a fictitious name which does not correspond to the actual name of a party to the proceedings.
Council Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 of 20 December 2010 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation (OJ 2010 L 343, p. 10).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2925/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—