EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Opinion of Mr Advocate General delivered on 28 February 1989. # SC Belasco and others v Commission of the European Communities. # Competition - Application of Article 85 of the EEC Treaty to an agreement concerning roofing felt. # Case 246/86.

ECLI:EU:C:1989:95

61986CC0246(01)

February 28, 1989
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Important legal notice

61986C0246(01)

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Mischo delivered on 28 February 1989. - SC Belasco and others v Commission of the European Communities. - Competition - Application of Article 85 of the EEC Treaty to an agreement concerning roofing felt. - Case 246/86.

European Court reports 1989 Page 02117

Opinion of the Advocate-General

++++

Mr President,

Members of the Court,

1 . The new hearing held in Case 246/88 on 14 February 1989 did not bring to light any fresh information such as to prompt me to change the first Opinion which I delivered in this case on 5 May 1988 . I therefore now confirm the reasoning set out in that Opinion and the conclusion which I reached .

2 . I should merely like to make one clarification regarding the problem of the effect on trade between Member States . For the reasons given in my first Opinion, I am convinced that there has been such an effect in the present case .

3 . But I do not share the opinion that in the case of a purely national agreement it is permissible to conclude that trade between Member States has been affected solely because the structure of competition within that Member State has been changed in such a way that imports encounter conditions different from those which would have prevailed in the absence of the agreement . It seems to me that if such a principle were upheld, the great majority of purely national agreements would be deemed to affect trade between the Member States and would be caught by Article 85 . I do not think that such a result is in conformity with the spirit of that provision .

(*) Original language : French .

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia