- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-193/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 11 March 2022 — TR, UQ v FTI Touristik GmbH
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0193
62022CN0193
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 237/35
(Case C-193/22)
(2022/C 237/44)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: TR, UQ
Defendant: FTI Touristik GmbH
Questions referred
(a) as meaning that the assessment of the justification of the termination must be based solely on such unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances as have already occurred at the time of termination,
(b) or as meaning that it is also necessary to take into account extraordinary circumstances that actually occur after the termination but before the planned start of the journey (being the latest possible date of termination)?
If (a) is answered in the affirmative:
(aa): Is Article 12(2) of the directive to be interpreted as meaning that, in the course of legal proceedings on the justification of termination, travellers may also rely on such unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances as had already occurred at the time of termination but of which they only became aware later?
(1) Directive (EU) 2015/2302 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on package travel and linked travel arrangements, amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 90/314/EEC (OJ 2015 L 326, p. 1).