- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-487/20: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia — Romania) — Philips Orăştie S.R.L. v Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Harmonisation of fiscal legislation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 179 and 183 — Right to deduct VAT — Conditions — Compensation or refund of excess VAT — Additional liabilities — Principle of fiscal neutrality — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CA0487
62020CA0487
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 148/4
(Case C-487/20) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Harmonisation of fiscal legislation - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 179 and 183 - Right to deduct VAT - Conditions - Compensation or refund of excess VAT - Additional liabilities - Principle of fiscal neutrality - Principles of equivalence and effectiveness)
(2022/C 148/05)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Philips Orăştie S.R.L.
Defendant: Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili
Operative part of the judgment
The first paragraph of Article 179 and the first paragraph of Article 183 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as well as the principle of equivalence, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which lays down detailed procedural rules governing actions for the refund of value added tax (VAT), based on an infringement of the common system of VAT, less favourable than those applicable to similar actions based on an infringement of domestic law relating to duties and taxes other than VAT.
(*)
Language of the case: Romanian