I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2008/C 272/09)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J.-P. Keppenne and R. Lyal, acting as Agents)
Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium
—Declare that, since it does not prevent double taxation of dividends paid by undertakings domiciled in another Member State or EEA/EFTA State to natural persons, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 56 EC and Article 40 of the European Economic Area Agreement;
—order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.
By its action, the Commission submits that Belgian tax legislation creates an unjustified restriction on the free movement of capital inasmuch as it taxes dividends payment to natural persons by companies established in another Member State or in a State of the European Economic Area (‘incoming’ dividends) in the same way as dividends paid by companies established in Belgium (‘internal’ dividends), without taking into account taxation at source paid in the State from which the dividends originate. Such legislation penalises cross-border capital transactions since it dissuades individual taxpayers from investing in shares in foreign companies and at the same time it constitutes an obstacle to the accumulation of capital in Belgium for companies having their registered office in other Member States.