I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Appeal - Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Board (SRB) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Determination of the 2016 ex ante contribution - Action for annulment - Period within which proceedings must be commenced - Late submission - Challengeable act - Confirmatory act)
(2021/C 502/05)
Language of the case: German
Appellant: NRW. Bank (represented by: J. Seitz, J. Witte and D. Flore, Rechtsanwälte)
Other parties to the proceedings: Single Resolution Board (SRB) (represented by: H. Ehlers, J. Kerlin and P. A. Messina, acting as Agents, and B. Meyring, S. Schelo, T. Klupsch and S. Ianc, Rechtsanwälte), Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Sikora-Kalėda and M. J. Bauerschmidt, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented initially by: D. Triantafyllou, K.-P. Wojcik and A. Steiblytė, and subsequently by D. Triantafyllou and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 26 June 2019, NRW. Bank v SRB (T-466/16, not published, EU:T:2019:445);
2.Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;
3.Reserves the costs.
(1)
OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.