- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-649/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco (Spain) lodged on 14 October 2022 — XXX v Randstad Empleo, S. A., Ferrovial Servicios, S. A., Axa Seguros Generales S. A. de Seguros y Reaseguros
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0649
62022CN0649
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.3.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 112/14
(Case C-649/22)
(2023/C 112/18)
Language of the case: Spanish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: XXX
Respondents: Randstad Empleo, S. A., Ferrovial Servicios, S. A., Axa Seguros Generales S. A. de Seguros y Reaseguros
Question referred
Must Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union and Article 3[1](f) and Article 5 of Directive 2008/104 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council be interpreted as precluding a case-law interpretation of Spanish legislation according to which compensation for a temporary agency worker whose employment contract has been terminated following a declaration of total permanent incapacity resulting from an accident at work sustained at the user undertaking is excluded from the concept of ‘basic working and employment conditions’?
(1) Directive 2008/104/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on temporary agency work (OJ 2008 L 327, p. 9).