EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 September 1964. # Jean Maudet v Commission of the European Economic Community. # Joined cases 20/63 and 21/63.

ECLI:EU:C:1964:69

61963CO0020

September 30, 1964
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61963O0020

European Court reports French edition Page 01209 Dutch edition Page 01271 German edition Page 01323 Italian edition Page 01193 English special edition Page 00621

Parties

++++

IN JOINED CASES 20 AND 21/63

JEAN MAUDET, AN OFFICIAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, REPRESENTED BY LOUIS ROUSSEAU, ADVOCATE AT THE CONSEIL D'ETAT AND COUR DE CASSATION, PARIS, APPLICANT,

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL ADVISER, LOUIS DE LA FONTAINE, ACTING AS AGENT, DEFENDANT,

Grounds

WHEREAS UNDER SUBPARAGRAPH ( B ) OF ARTICLE 73 OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COURT, THE ONLY RECOVERABLE FEES FOR ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE ARE THOSE NECESSARILY INCURRED FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE PROCEEDINGS;

WHEREAS SERVICES SUPPLIED TO THE APPLICANT BY THE LAWYER PROVIDING THE ADDRESS FOR SERVICE AND WHICH INVOLVE THE PAYMENT OF FEES BEAR A RESEMBLANCE TO SERVICES SUPPLIED BY THE APPLICANT'S ADVISER OR LAWYER; WHEREAS IN THIS RESPECT THE ABOVE PROVISION STATES THAT ONLY THE REMUNERATION DUE TO AN ADVISER OR LAWYER SHALL BE RECOVERABLE;

WHEREAS THE ONLY OBLIGATION ON PRIVATE PARTIES UNDER THE SECOND PARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 17 OF THE PROTOCOL ON THE STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EEC IS THAT IN ACTIONS BEFORE THE COURT THEY SHALL BE REPRESENTED BY A LAWYER;

WHEREAS, THEREFORE, WITHIN THE MEANING OF SUBPARAGRAH ( B ) OF ARTICLE 73 OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE, ONLY THE REMUNERATION OF THE LAWYER REPRESENTING A PRIVATE PARTY IN AN ACTION BEFORE THE COURT MAY BE REGARDED AS NECESSARY EXPENSES OF LEGAL ASSISTANCE;

WHEREAS, THEREFORE, WHILST A PARTY TO AN ACTION BEFORE THE COURT IS FREE TO EMPLOY AN ADVISER IN ADDITION TO THE LAWYER REPRESENTING HIM BEFORE THE COURT, THE ADDITIONAL EXPENSES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF SO DOING CANNOT BE RECOVERABLE;

WHEREAS, THEREFORE, EXPENSES INCURRED IN THIS CASE AS A RESULT OF MR ARENDT'S SERVICES ARE RECOVERABLE ONLY IN SO FAR AS THE FEES FOR ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE IN THE PROPER SENSE ARE CONCERNED AND ANY FEES PAYABLE IN RESPECT OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES ARE NOT SO RECOVERABLE,

Operative part

THE COURT ( FIRST CHAMBER )

HEREBY ORDERS :

THE TOTAL SUM RECOVERABLE IN THIS CASE BY WAY OF FEES FOR ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE SHALL BE FIXED AT 2500 LUXEMBOURG FRANCS.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia