I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2022/C 472/56)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: moderne Stadt Gesellschaft zur Förderung des Städtebaues und der Gemeindeentwicklung mbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: G. Simon and L. Daams, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘DEUTZER HAFEN KÖLN’ — Application No 18 401 434
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 August 2022 in Case R 2196/2021-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) read in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) read in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of the principle of equal treatment.