EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-259/11: Order of the General Court of 9 October 2013 — Zinātnes, inovāciju un testēšanas centrs v Commission (Action for annulment — Phare programme — Project concerning the development of a centre for innovation and testing of construction products — Commission decision to undertake recovery of part of the sums paid — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TB0259

62011TB0259

October 9, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

7.12.2013

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/11

(Case T-259/11)(Action for annulment - Phare programme - Project concerning the development of a centre for innovation and testing of construction products - Commission decision to undertake recovery of part of the sums paid - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 359/19

Language of the case: Latvian

Parties

Applicant: Zinātnes, inovāciju un testēšanas centrs (Jelgava, Latvia) (represented by: E. Darapoļskis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. van Nuffel and A. Sauka, Agents)

Re:

Action brought by the association Zinātnes, inovāciju un testēšanas centrs in accordance with Article 263 TFEU, seeking annulment of the Commission’s decision notified to the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Latvia by letter dated 16 November 2010.

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2.The application for access to Commission documents is also dismissed.

3.Zinātnes, inovāciju un testēšanas centrs shall pay the costs.

4.There is no need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene from the Republic of Latvia and the Republic of Lithuania.

(1)

OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia