I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-259/11)(Action for annulment - Phare programme - Project concerning the development of a centre for innovation and testing of construction products - Commission decision to undertake recovery of part of the sums paid - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)
2013/C 359/19
Language of the case: Latvian
Applicant: Zinātnes, inovāciju un testēšanas centrs (Jelgava, Latvia) (represented by: E. Darapoļskis, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. van Nuffel and A. Sauka, Agents)
Action brought by the association Zinātnes, inovāciju un testēšanas centrs in accordance with Article 263 TFEU, seeking annulment of the Commission’s decision notified to the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Latvia by letter dated 16 November 2010.
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.The application for access to Commission documents is also dismissed.
3.Zinātnes, inovāciju un testēšanas centrs shall pay the costs.
4.There is no need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene from the Republic of Latvia and the Republic of Lithuania.
(1)
OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.