- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-4/16: Order of the General Court of 2 June 2016 — Rabbit v EUIPO — DMG Media (rabbit) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TB0004
62016TB0004
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.8.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 305/38
(Case T-4/16)(1)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))
(2016/C 305/52)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Rabbit, Inc. (Redwood City, California, United States) (represented by: M. Engelman, Barrister, and J. Stephenson, Solicitor)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O'Neill, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: DMG Media Ltd (London, United Kingdom)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 October 2015 (Case R 2133/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between DMG Media Ltd and Rabbit, Inc.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Rabbit, Inc. is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
(1)
OJ C 156, 2.5.2016.