- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-348/06 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 February 2008 — Marie-Claude Girardot v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal — Temporary staff — Action for damages — Loss of an opportunity to be recruited — Actual and certain damage — Determination of extent of reparation for damage)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62006CA0348
62006CA0348
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
(Case C-348/06 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Temporary staff - Action for damages - Loss of an opportunity to be recruited - Actual and certain damage - Determination of extent of reparation for damage)
(2008/C 92/08)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Martin and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, agents)
Other party to the proceedings: Marie-Claude Girardot (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 6 June 2006 in Case T-10/02 Girardot v Commission, by which that Court fixed the level of compensation to be paid by the Commission to Ms Marie-Claude Girardot under the interim judgment of the Court of First Instance of 31 March 2004 at EUR 92 785, together with interest as from 6 September 2004, at the rate fixed by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations, plus two percentage points — Infringement of Article 236 EC and of the conditions governing the liability of the Commission — Method of calculation of the sum payable by a Community institution to compensate for the loss of an opportunity to be recruited in that institution resulting from an unlawful decision on its part
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the main appeal and the cross-appeal.
2.Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs of the main appeal.
3.Orders Mrs Girardot to pay the costs of the cross-appeal.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 249, 14.10.2006.
* * *