- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-250/18: Action brought on 23 April 2018 — RATP v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0250
62018TN0250
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-250/18)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Régie autonome des transports parisiens (RATP) (Paris, France) (represented by: E. Morgan de Rivery, P. Delelis and C. Lavin, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the Commission decision of 21 March 2018 granting partial access to documents pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents;
—in any event, order the Commission to pay all the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 4(2), third indent, of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).
2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 4(2), third indent, of Regulation No 1049/2001.
3.Third plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 4(2), first indent, of Regulation No 1049/2001, Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights, Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 339 TFEU.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the obligation to state reasons.