Official Journal of the European Union

C series

—

C/2025/734

10.2.2025

(Case T-598/24)

(C/2025/734)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: GF (represented by: N. Flandin, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Cybersecurity

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—declare the present appeal admissible and founded;

—annul the ENISA’s decision 2024/02 of 26 January 2024 terminating the applicant’s contract and including the probation report;

—in so far as necessary, annul the decision MB/2024/12 of the Management Board of 20 August 2024 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant against the decision terminating her contract;

—order the compensation of the material and moral prejudice suffered by the applicant; and,

—order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision, including the probation report, and the decision rejecting the complaint have been taken in violation of the Agency’s duty of care and in violation of Article 41 of the Charter.

2.Second plea in law, alleging that the contested decision, including the probation report and the decision rejecting the complaint are vitiated by manifest errors of appreciation and a lack of supportive evidence in the assessment of the applicant’s performance – Violation of the right of good administration.

3.Third plea in law, alleging that the contested decision, including the probation report and the decision rejecting the complaint are vitiated by a manifest error of assessment by not taking into account the fact that the applicant did not work under normal conditions.

—

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/734/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

—