I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark PANTHÉ - Earlier national word and figurative marks PANTHER and earlier EU figurative mark P PANTHER - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark)
(2021/C 128/43)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: El Corte Inglés (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: MKR Design Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by: G. Dragotti, lawyer)
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 December 2019 (Case R 378/2019-5), relating to opposition proceedings between El Corte Inglés and MKR Design.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders El Corte Inglés, SA, to pay the costs.
OJ C 129, 20.4.2020.