- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-587/22: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 December 2023 — European Commission v Hungary (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 91/271/EEC — Treatment of urban waste water — Article 3 — Collecting systems — Individual systems — Article 4 — Secondary or equivalent treatment — Article 5 — Sensitive areas — Article 15 — Monitoring of discharges)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0587
62022CA0587
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2024/924
29.1.2024
(Case C-587/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Environment - Directive 91/271/EEC - Treatment of urban waste water - Article 3 - Collecting systems - Individual systems - Article 4 - Secondary or equivalent treatment - Article 5 - Sensitive areas - Article 15 - Monitoring of discharges)
(C/2024/924)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Parties
Applicant: European Commission (represented by: E. Sanfrutos Cano and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)
Defendant: Hungary (represented by: Zs. Biró-Tóth and M.Z. Fehér, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Declares that by failing to take the necessary measures to ensure that the agglomerations of Békés, of Dabas, of Dunavarsány, of Hódmezővásárhely, of Keszthely, of Kéthely, of Kiskunhalas, of Köröm, of Marcali, of Mezőtúr, of Nagykőrös, of Pilisvörösvár, of Soltvadkert, of Szécsény, of Szentendre, of Szentes, of Szigetszentmiklós, of Tököl, of Tolna, of Veresegyház, of Zalaegerszeg and of Zalakaros are provided with collecting systems for urban waste water and connections to those systems, Hungary has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3 and 10 of Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment;
2.Declares that by failing to take the measures necessary to ensure that, in the agglomerations of Békés, of Dabas, of Dunavarsány, of Hódmezővásárhely, of Keszthely, of Kéthely, of Kiskunhalas, of Köröm, of Marcali, of Mezőtúr, of Nagykőrös, of Pilisvörösvár, of Soltvadkert, of Szécsény, of Szentendre, of Szentes, of Szigetszentmiklós, of Tököl, of Tolna, of Veresegyház, of Zalaegerszeg and of Zalakaros, urban waste water entering collecting systems is, before discharge, subject to secondary treatment or an equivalent treatment, Hungary has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4 and 10 of Directive 91/271;
3.Declares that by failing to take the measures necessary to ensure that, in the agglomerations of Keszthely, of Kéthely, of Marcali, of Zalaegerszeg and of Zalakaros, urban waste water entering collecting systems is, before discharge, subject to more stringent treatment than secondary treatment, Hungary has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 5 and 10 of Directive 91/271;
4.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
5.Orders Hungary to bear, in addition to its own costs, three quarters of the Commission’s costs;
6.Orders the Commission to bear one quarter of its own costs.
*
Language of the case: Hungarian.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/924/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *
OJ C 398, 17.10.2022.
ECLI:EU:C:2025:140