- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-259/18: Action brought on 23 April 2018 — Zakłady Chemiczne ‘Siarkopol’ Tarnobrzeg v EUIPO — EuroChem Agro (Unifoska)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0259
62018TN0259
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
201806080201931232018/C 221/412592018TC22120180625EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180423353511
(Case T-259/18)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Zakłady Chemiczne ‘Siarkopol’ Tarnobrzeg sp. z o.o. (Tarnobrzeg, Poland) (represented by: M. Kondrat, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: EuroChem Agro GmbH (Mannheim, Germany).
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark Unifoska — Application for registration No 015017841
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 February 2018 in Case R 1503/2017-5.
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and refer the case back to the EUIPO for reconsideration;
or
—alter the contested decision by stating that there are no relative grounds for refusal of registration of the EUTMA 01501784 ‘Unifoska’ for all goods in class 1 and the trademark shall be registered;
—award the costs in the Applicant's favor.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001;
—Infringement of principle of the protection of legitimate expectations and principle of legal certainty.