- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-420/24: Action brought on 13 August 2024 – Corning v EUIPO – Centro Ottico Megavision (PYREX)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0420
62024TN0420
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/5508
23.9.2024
(Case T-420/24)
(C/2024/5508)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Corning Inc. (Corning, New York, United States) (represented by: R. de Beer, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Centro Ottico Megavision Srl (Codigoro, Italy)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark PYREX – Application for registration No 18 340 713
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 June 2024 in Case R 2025/2023-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—remit the case to EUIPO so that it can alter the decision on the substance of the case;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Opposition Division, the Board of Appeal and the General Court.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5508/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—