I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-61/15)(1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark 1e1 - Earlier national word mark UNO E and earlier figurative mark unoe - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2016/C 136/47)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: 1&1 Internet AG (Montabaur, Germany) (represented by: G. Klopp, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Unoe Bank, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: N. González-Alberto Rodríguez, lawyer)
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 December 2014 (Case R 101/2014-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Unoe Bank, SA and 1&1 Internet AG.
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 December 2014 (Case R 101/2014-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Unoe Bank, SA and 1&1 Internet AG;
2.Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by 1&1 Internet AG;
3.Orders Unoe Bank, SA to bear its own costs.
OJ C 107, 30.3.2015.