- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-21/17: Action brought on 13 January 2017 — RL v Court of Justice of the European Union
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0021
62017TN0021
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.3.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 95/14
(Case T-21/17)
(2017/C 095/23)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: RL (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz and A. Tymen, lawyers)
Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare the present application admissible;
—annul the decision adopted on 11 May 2016 by the Registrar of the Court of Justice, the contents of which were communicated to the applicant by letter of 20 May 2016, not to promote the applicant to Grade AD 10 as of 1 July 2015 and, so far as necessary, annul the decision adopted on 6 October 2016 by the Complaints Committee rejecting the complaint brought by the applicant dated 22 July 2016;
—order the defendant to pay compensation in respect of the material harm suffered by the applicant;
—order the defendant to pay all the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and of the internal promotion system in place within the Court of Justice of the European Union;
2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the principles of equal treatment and of a single European civil service.