I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network and the Taliban – Freezing of funds – Fundamental rights – Jus cogens – Review by the Court – Action for annulment and damages
3. European Communities – Judicial review of the legality of the acts of the institutions (Council Regulation No 881/2002) (see para. 92)
5. European Communities – Judicial review of the legality of the acts of the institutions (Council Regulation No 881/2002, as amended by Regulation No 2049/2003) (see para. 92)
7. European Communities – Act implementing resolutions of the United Nations Security Council – Regulation No 881/2002 (Art. 6 EU; Council Regulation No 881/2002) (see paras 115-120, 122)
8. European Communities – Judicial review of the legality of the acts of the institutions – Act implementing resolutions of the United Nations Security Council – Regulations Nos 881/2002 and 2049/2003 (Council Regulation No 881/2002; Commission Regulation No 2049/2003) (see paras 126-128)
Re:
APPLICATION, first, for the annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001 prohibiting the export of certain goods and services to Afghanistan, strengthening the flight ban and extending the freeze of funds and other financial resources in respect of the Taliban of Afghanistan (OJ 2002 L 139, p. 9), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2049/2003 of 20 November 2003 amending Regulation No 881/2002 for the 25th time (OJ 2003 L 303, p. 20), and, second, for damages.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders the applicant to pay the costs.