- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-209/25, Premium Food Kebab: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 18 March 2025 – Premium Food Kebab sp. z o.o. v Cydonia sp. z o.o.
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025CN0209
62025CN0209
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2025/3400
30.6.2025
(Case C-209/25, Premium Food Kebab)
(C/2025/3400)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Premium Food Kebab sp. z o.o.
Defendant: Cydonia sp. z o.o.
Question referred
Must Article 6(1) of Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) be interpreted as meaning that a national court may refuse to award fixed-sum compensation for recovery costs when the circumstances in which the party entitled claimed the compensation indicate that the compensation sought is not fair, and that seeking compensation for recovery costs is contrary to the objectives of the directive?
—
(1) OJ 2011 L 48, p. 1.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3400/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—