I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-456/10) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for animal feed phosphates - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Allocation of sales quotas, coordination of prices and conditions of sale and exchange of commercially sensitive information - Applicant’s withdrawal from the settlement procedure - Fines - Obligation to state reasons - Gravity and duration of the infringement - Cooperation - Failure to apply the likely range of fines indicated during the settlement procedure))
(2015/C 221/08)
Language of the case: French
Applicants: Timab Industries (Dinard, France); and Cie financière et de participations Roullier (CFPR) (Saint-Malo, France) (represented by: N. Lenoir and M. Truffier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito, B. Mongin and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, acting as Agents)
Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 5001 final of 20 July 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38866 — Animal feed phosphates), and, in the alternative, for reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants in that decision.
The Court:
1)Dismisses the action;
2)Orders Timab Industries and Cie financière et de participations Roullier (CFPR) to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 346, 18.12.2010.