- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-736/20: Order of the General Court of 11 February 2022 — OP v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Recruitment — Open Competition EPSO/AST/147/19 — Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list for the competition — Obligation to state reasons — Equal treatment)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TB0736
62020TB0736
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 148/24
(Case T-736/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Open Competition EPSO/AST/147/19 - Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list for the competition - Obligation to state reasons - Equal treatment)
(2022/C 148/32)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: OP (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Melo Sampaio and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the selection board of Open Competition EPSO/AST/147/19 of 5 February 2020 not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list of that competition.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
2.OP shall pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 79, 8.3.2021.