- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-831/17: Judgment of the General Court of 15 November 2018 — DRH Licensing & Managing v EUIPO — Merck (Flexagil) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark Flexagil — Genuine use of the mark — Article 18(1), second subparagraph,(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TA0831
62017TA0831
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Tenth Chamber)
21.1.2019
C 25/41
(Case T-831/17) (*)
((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark Flexagil - Genuine use of the mark - Article 18(1), second subparagraph,(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character))
(2019/C 25/53)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: DRH Licensing & Managing AG (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: S. Salomonowitz, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: W. Schramek and M. Fischer, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 October 2017 (Case R 2043/2016-4), relating to revocation proceedings between DRH Licensing & Managing and Merck.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders DRH Licensing & Managing AG to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: German.
ECLI:EU:C:2025:140