I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(C/2025/2917)
Language in which the application was lodged: Polish
Applicant: Grzegorz Mordalski (Działoszyn, Poland) (represented by: A. Korbela, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Anita Food, SA (Lima, Peru)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark ‘ANITA’ – EU trade mark No 8 109 993
Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 February 2025 in Case R 1567/2024-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 February 2025 in Case R 1567/2024-4, dismissing the appeal; and also
—annul the decision of EUIPO’s Cancellation Division of 7 June 2024 in Case 47 087 C (preceding the abovementioned decision), which rejected the application for a declaration of invalidity of the EU word and figurative mark ANITA No 8 109 993; and
—refer back to the EUIPO for reconsideration the application dated 1 November 2020 for a declaration of invalidity of the registration of the EU word and figurative mark No 8 109 993, registration of which was sought on 18 February 2009 and which was protected until 18 February 2019, registered in the name and on behalf of Anita Food S.A;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of the second sentence of recital 3 of Directive (EU) 2015/2436 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks, (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>), which ensures that ‘Trade mark protection in the Member States coexists with protection at Union level’ – whereas, as a result of the interpretation of the law made in the contested decision, the protection of a trade mark available at EU level excludes the protection of a trade mark in a Member State;
—Infringement of Article 7 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
—
Directive (EU) 2015/2436 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ 2015 L 336, p. 1).
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2917/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—