- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-357/24, Freistaat Bayern: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske (Croatia) lodged on 16 May 2024 – Freistaat Bayern v Euroherc osiguranje d.d.
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0357
62024CN0357
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/5492
23.9.2024
(Case C-357/24, Freistaat Bayern)
(C/2024/5492)
Language of the case: Croatian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Freistaat Bayern
Defendant: Euroherc osiguranje d.d.
Question referred
Must Article 85(1) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (1) be interpreted as meaning that in order for an employer, as the institution obliged to pay benefits, to have a recourse claim for sickness benefits paid to an employee for an injury resulting from events that occurred in the territory of another Member State against the third party liable to provide compensation for the injury or against its civil liability insurer, it is necessary for there to exist a legal basis for claiming such compensation in the Member State where the injury occurred?
—
(1) Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ 2004 L 166, p. 1).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5492/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
—