- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-83/20: Order of the General Court of 16 June 2022 — bonnanwalt v EUIPO — Bayerischer Rundfunk and Others (tagesschau) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark tagesschau — Partial revocation — Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TB0083
62020TB0083
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 303/44
(Case T-83/20) (*)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark tagesschau - Partial revocation - Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant - Inadmissibility)
(2022/C 303/56)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: bonnanwalt Vermögens- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: T. Wendt, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Bayerischer Rundfunk (Munich, Germany) and the eight other interveners whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: B. Krause, lawyer)
Re:
By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 December 2019 (Case R 1487/2019-2).
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.bonnanwalt Vermögens- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH shall pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: German
* * *
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 114, 6.4.2020.