- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-93/21: Judgment of the General Court of 11 May 2022 — Creaticon v EUIPO — Paul Hartmann (SK SKINTEGRA THE RARE MOLECULE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — EU figurative mark SK SKINTEGRA THE RARE MOLECULE — Earlier national word mark SKINTEGRITY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0093
62021TA0093
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 266/22
(Case T-93/21) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - EU figurative mark SK SKINTEGRA THE RARE MOLECULE - Earlier national word mark SKINTEGRITY - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Creaticon d.o.o. (Zagreb, Croatia) (represented by: P. Krmpotić, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Paul Hartmann AG (Heidenheim, Germany)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and modification of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 December 2020 (Case R 847/2020-5).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Creaticon d.o.o. to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
OJ C 138, 19.4.2021.
ECLI:EU:C:2022:140
* * *
(1) Language of the case: English.