EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-56/22: Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2024 — United Kingdom v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Conformity clearance procedure — Action for annulment — Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom — Representation by a lawyer authorised to practise before a court of a Member State or of another State which is a party to the EEA Agreement — Locus standi — Admissibility — Active farmer — Concept of ‘group of natural or legal persons’)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0056

62022TA0056

January 31, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/2152

25.3.2024

(Case T-56/22) (*)

(EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Conformity clearance procedure - Action for annulment - Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom - Representation by a lawyer authorised to practise before a court of a Member State or of another State which is a party to the EEA Agreement - Locus standi - Admissibility - Active farmer - Concept of ‘group of natural or legal persons’)

(C/2024/2152)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: S. Fuller, acting as Agent, and by T. Buley, KC)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Krämer, J. Aquilina and A. Becker, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Czech Republic (represented by M. Smolek, J. Vláčil, O. Serdula and J. Očková, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland seeks the partial annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2020 of 17 November 2021 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2021 L 413, p. 10), in so far as it concerns expenditure that the United Kingdom incurred in 2017 in the amount of EUR 2 686 358,72.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs.

(*)

Language of the case: English.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2152/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

(1) Language of the case: English.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia