- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-830/16: Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — Monolith Frost v EUIPO — Dovgan (PLOMBIR) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark PLOMBIR — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Examination of the facts — Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TA0830
62016TA0830
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
4.3.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 82/49
(Case T-830/16) (*)
((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark PLOMBIR - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Examination of the facts - Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court))
(2019/C 82/56)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Monolith Frost GmbH (Leopoldshöhe, Germany) (represented by: E. Liebich and S. Labesius, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, D. Walicka and M. Fischer, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Dovgan GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 September 2016 (Case R 1812/2015-4) relating to invalidity proceedings between Monolith Frost and Dovgan.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 September 2016 (Case R 1812/2015-4);
2.Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Monolith Frost GmbH, including the costs necessarily incurred by Monolith Frost for the purpose of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO;
3.Orders Dovgan GmbH to bear its own costs.
(*)
Language of the case: German
ECLI:EU:C:2019:140