- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-621/22: Action brought on 4 October 2022 — SB v EEAS
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0621
62022TN0621
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 441/29
(Case T-621/22)
(2022/C 441/40)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: SB (represented by: L. Burguin, T. Bontinck and A. Guillerme, lawyers)
Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—find that the EEAS is liable;
—order the EEAS to pay the sum of EUR 80 000 in respect of non-material harm and EUR 720 000 in respect of material harm;
—order the defence to bear the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action against the two decisions of 10 November 2021 rejecting the applicant’s applications for the positions of Head of Delegation of the European Union, first, in [confidential] and, second, in [confidential], the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment.
2.Second plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of legitimate expectations.
3.Third plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of equal treatment.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging the existence of a misuse of powers.
* Language of the case: French.
Confidential information omitted.