EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-317/10 P: Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2013 — L v Parliament (Appeals — Staff cases — Members of the temporary staff — Contract for an indefinite period — Decision to dismiss — Obligation to state reasons — Loss of trust)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TA0317

62010TA0317

September 11, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

19.10.2013

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/9

(Case T-317/10 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)

(Appeals - Staff cases - Members of the temporary staff - Contract for an indefinite period - Decision to dismiss - Obligation to state reasons - Loss of trust)

2013/C 304/18

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Parties

Appellant: L (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented: initially by A. Sèbe and V. Sviderskis and subsequently by A. Sèbe, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented: initially by S. Seyr, K. Zejdová and L. Mašalaitė-Chouteau, subsequently by S. Seyr, K. Zejdová and S. Milius, and finally by S. Seyr and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union [confidential] (<span class="super">2</span>) seeking to have that judgment set aside

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Sets aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union [confidential] in so far as it did not rule on the plea alleging infringement of the principle of impartiality, rejected the plea alleging factual inaccuracy and a manifest error of assessment and held that the appellant had not claimed that the Parliament should be ordered to pay the costs;

2.Dismisses the appeal as to the remainder;

3.Dismisses the action brought by Mr L before the Civil Service Tribunal in Case [confidential] as to the remainder;

4.Orders each party to bear its own costs relating both to the first instance proceedings and the appeal proceedings.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 340, 19.11.2011.

(<span class="super">2</span>) Confidential data omitted.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia