EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-89/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2024 – PV v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Request for assistance – Refusal of the request – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary sanction – Removal from post – Withdrawal of removal from post – New disciplinary procedure – New removal from post – Unjustified absences – Conflict of interests – Impartiality – Material and non-material damage)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0089

62020TA0089

June 19, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/4718

5.8.2024

(Case T-89/20)

(Civil service - Officials - Psychological harassment - Request for assistance - Refusal of the request - Disciplinary proceedings - Disciplinary sanction - Removal from post - Withdrawal of removal from post - New disciplinary procedure - New removal from post - Unjustified absences - Conflict of interests - Impartiality - Material and non-material damage)

(C/2024/4718)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: PV (represented by: D. Birkenmaier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of (i) the decision of 12 December 2019 by which the appointing authority refused his request for assistance D/456/19, (ii) the decision of 21 October 2019 to remove him from post, (iii) 11 decisions regarding his unjustified absences and the decision rejecting complaint R/519/19, and (iv) the letter of 21 September 2016 regarding the amount he owed as a result of his unauthorised absences and the decision rejecting complaint R/537/19 and, second, compensation for the damage purportedly suffered as a result of those decisions.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Declares that each party is to bear its own costs.

Language of the case: French.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4718/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia