EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-697/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 July 2024 – Koiviston Auto Helsinki Oy, formerly Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy v European Commission, Republic of Finland, Nobina Oy, Nobina AB (Appeal – State aid – SA.33846 (2015/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2011/CP) – Relevant issue post-dating the publication of the decision initiating the formal investigation procedure – Identification of the beneficiary of the aid – Obligation to publish an amending opening decision – Right of the beneficiary of the aid to submit comments – Essential procedural requirement – Incompatibility with the internal market – Recovery of the aid ordered by the European Commission – Amount to be recovered – Competence of the Member State concerned)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0697

62022CA0697

July 29, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/5594

30.9.2024

(Case C-697/22 P)

(Appeal - State aid - SA.33846 (2015/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2011/CP) - Relevant issue post-dating the publication of the decision initiating the formal investigation procedure - Identification of the beneficiary of the aid - Obligation to publish an amending opening decision - Right of the beneficiary of the aid to submit comments - Essential procedural requirement - Incompatibility with the internal market - Recovery of the aid ordered by the European Commission - Amount to be recovered - Competence of the Member State concerned)

(C/2024/5594)

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Appellant: Koiviston Auto Helsinki Oy, formerly Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy (represented by: O. Hyvönen and N. Rosenlund, asianajajat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: M. Huttunen, J. Ringborg and F. Tomat, acting as Agents), Republic of Finland, Nobina Oy, Nobina AB

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 14 September 2022, Helsingin Bussiliikenne v Commission (T-603/19, EU:T:2022:555);

2.Annuls Commission Decision (EU) 2020/1814 of 28 June 2019 on State aid SA.33846 – (2015/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2011/CP) implemented by Finland for Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy;

3.Orders the European Commission to pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by Koiviston Auto Helsinki Oy, relating to the proceedings both at first instance and on appeal.

(1)

OJ C 15, 16.1.2023.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5594/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

Language of the case: Finnish

ECLI:EU:C:2025:140

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia