I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
30.9.2024
(Case C-697/22 P)
(Appeal - State aid - SA.33846 (2015/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2011/CP) - Relevant issue post-dating the publication of the decision initiating the formal investigation procedure - Identification of the beneficiary of the aid - Obligation to publish an amending opening decision - Right of the beneficiary of the aid to submit comments - Essential procedural requirement - Incompatibility with the internal market - Recovery of the aid ordered by the European Commission - Amount to be recovered - Competence of the Member State concerned)
(C/2024/5594)
Language of the case: Finnish
Appellant: Koiviston Auto Helsinki Oy, formerly Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy (represented by: O. Hyvönen and N. Rosenlund, asianajajat)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: M. Huttunen, J. Ringborg and F. Tomat, acting as Agents), Republic of Finland, Nobina Oy, Nobina AB
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 14 September 2022, Helsingin Bussiliikenne v Commission (T-603/19, EU:T:2022:555);
2.Annuls Commission Decision (EU) 2020/1814 of 28 June 2019 on State aid SA.33846 – (2015/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2011/CP) implemented by Finland for Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy;
3.Orders the European Commission to pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by Koiviston Auto Helsinki Oy, relating to the proceedings both at first instance and on appeal.
—
(1)
OJ C 15, 16.1.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5594/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
Language of the case: Finnish
ECLI:EU:C:2025:140