- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-669/20: Action brought on 13 November 2020 — Pluscard Service v EUIPO (PLUSCARD)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0669
62020TN0669
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.1.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 28/57
(Case T-669/20)
(2021/C 28/86)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Pluscard Service-Gesellschaft für Kreditkarten-Processing mbH (Saarbrücken, Germany) (represented by: M. Dury, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark PLUSCARD — Application for registration No 1 494 424
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 September 2020 in Case R 638/2020-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that:
—the reasons given by EUIPO and the conclusions drawn by EUIPO shall be revisited;
—the registration of the sign PLUSCARD should therefore be granted as applied for, for all classes, including classes applied for;
—furthermore, due to the distinctive language barriers complicating the resolution of this case, the summoning of oral proceedings is requested and encouraged.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.