- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-235/24 PPU, Niesker: Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Specialised Chamber of the Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden – Netherlands) – S.A.H. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Recognition of judgments imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in another Member State – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of court or tribunal – Reassessment at the request of the minister – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CB0235
62024CB0235
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/5966
14.10.2024
(Case C-235/24 PPU, (1) Niesker) (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Recognition of judgments imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in another Member State - Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 267 TFEU - Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ - Reassessment at the request of the minister - Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
(C/2024/5966)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Defendant: S.A.H.
Other party to the proceedings: Openbaar Ministerie
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Specialised Chamber of the Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden (Court of Appeal, Arnhem-Leeuwarden, Netherlands), made by decision of 29 March 2024, is manifestly inadmissible.
—
(1) OJ C C/2024/3318.
(2) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5966/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
—