NEWModern Legal Agent: describe your case, get an answer backed by case law and a draft filing.
Try it for free
EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-235/24 PPU, Niesker: Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Specialised Chamber of the Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden – Netherlands) – S.A.H. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Recognition of judgments imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in another Member State – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of court or tribunal – Reassessment at the request of the minister – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CB0235

62024CB0235

July 17, 2024

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

—

C/2024/5966

14.10.2024

(Case C-235/24 PPU, (1) Niesker) (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Recognition of judgments imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in another Member State - Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 267 TFEU - Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ - Reassessment at the request of the minister - Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)

(C/2024/5966)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Defendant: S.A.H.

Other party to the proceedings: Openbaar Ministerie

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Specialised Chamber of the Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden (Court of Appeal, Arnhem-Leeuwarden, Netherlands), made by decision of 29 March 2024, is manifestly inadmissible.

—

(1) OJ C C/2024/3318.

(2) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5966/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

—

—

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia