- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-426/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Braga — Juízo do Trabalho de Barcelos (Portugal) lodged on 10 September 2020 — GD, ES v Luso Temp — Empresa de Trabalho Temporário, S. A.
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CN0426
62020CN0426
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.12.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 423/27
(Case C-426/20)
(2020/C 423/41)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: GD, ES
Defendant: Luso Temp — Empresa de Trabalho Temporário, S. A.
Question referred
Do Article 3(1)(f) and Article 5(1) of Directive 2008/104/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on temporary agency work preclude a provision of law such as that in Article 185(6) of the Código do Trabalho (Employment Code) (adopted by Law No 7/2009 of 12 February [2009]), under which temporary agency workers are, in all cases, entitled to paid holiday and the corresponding holiday bonus pay only pro rata to the period of service in the user undertaking, even where their employment relationship commences in one calendar year and ends two or more calendar years later, whereas a worker recruited directly by the user undertaking who occupies the same job for the same period of time will be subject to the general holiday provisions, meaning that he or she will be entitled to a longer period of paid holiday and more holiday bonus pay, since these are not pro rata to the period of service?
* Language of the case: Portuguese.
(1) OJ 2008 L 327, p. 9.