- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-512/24, BÁV: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 23 July 2024 – BÁV Zrt. v Budapest Főváros Kormányhivatala
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0512
62024CN0512
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/6404
(Case C-512/24, BÁV)
(C/2024/6404)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: BÁV Zrt.
Defendant: Budapest Főváros Kormányhivatala
Question referred
Must the concept ‘other metal components for jewellery making’, which appears in row 23, containing the entry on the substance cadmium, paragraph 10, point (i), of Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council, be interpreted as meaning that fillers used in brazing are also included in that concept?
Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ 2006 L 396, p. 1).
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6404/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
Language of the case: Hungarian.