- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-393/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud České republiky (Czech Republic) lodged on 15 June 2022 — EXTÉRIA, s. r. o. v Spravíme, s. r. o.
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0393
62022CN0393
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.9.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 359/32
(Case C-393/22)
(2022/C 359/36)
Language of the case: Czech
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: EXTÉRIA, s. r. o.
Defendant: Spravíme, s. r. o.
Question referred
Must Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters be interpreted as meaning that the concept ‘contract for the provision of services’ also includes a contract to enter into a future contract (pactum de contrahendo), in which the parties undertook to enter into a future contract that would be a contract for the provision of services, within the meaning of that provision?
* Language of the case: Czech.
(1) OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1.