- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-137/22: Action brought on 14 March 2022 — Netherlands v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0137
62022TN0137
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.5.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 198/53
(Case T-137/22)
(2022/C 198/77)
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: and M. Bulterman and J. Langer, acting as Agents)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—annul the Commission decision bearing reference number Ares (2022) 99942 refusing the request of the Kingdom of the Netherlands for an extension by 4 years in addition to the 8-year period rule for the recovery of unduly paid amounts resulting from the FresQ case, and
—order the Commission to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision is based on an erroneous assumption that the recovery procedure in the FresQ case is not yet finalised.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission makes an erroneous application of the third subparagraph of Article 54(2) of Regulation No 1306/2013 in so far as it assumes that the exceedance of the 8-year period for the recovery of the unduly paid amounts resulting from the FresQ case is attributable to the Netherlands.