I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Joined Cases T-230/08 and T-231/08) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Applications for Community word mark WIENER WERKSTÄTTE - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2010/C 328/47
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Paul Asenbaum (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: P. Vögel and E. Ploil, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, Agent)
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 April 2008 (Cases R 1573/2006-4 and R 1571/2006-4) concerning two applications for registration of the word sign WIENER WERKSTÄTTE as a Community trade mark.
The Court:
1.Orders that Cases T-230/08 and T-231/08 shall be joined for the purposes of the judgment;
2.Dismisses the actions.
3.Orders Mr Asenbaum to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 223, 30.8.2008.