I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing an armchair - Earlier design - Ground for invalidity - Lack of individual character - Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)
2014/C 78/19
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Sachi Premium-Outdoor Furniture, Lda (Estarreja, Portugal) (represented by: M. Oehen Mendes, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Gandia Blasco, SA (Valencia, Spain) (represented by: I. Sempere Massa, lawyer)
Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 April 2012 (Case R 969/2011-3) in relation to invalidity proceedings between Gandia Blasco, SA and Sachi Premium-Outdoor Furniture, Lda.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Sachi Premium-Outdoor Furniture Lda to pay its own costs and also the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM);
3.Orders Gandia Blasco, SA to pay its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 311, 13.10.2012.